Have you ever been accused by a professor of using AI (Artificial Intelligence)? The idea of being blamed for using the tool can be a modern form of an offense that lowers a writer’s integrity. I once had a friend back in my senior year of high school, a fellow student and aspiring journalist, who was told by our teacher, with a deadly look of certainty, that her article had been written with QuillBot. This reflects a prominent unease in journalism and academia: how the use of AI challenges credibility, authorship, and accountability. According to a report by the ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) Foundation in 2026, 83 percent of students in the Philippines have used generative AI for educational purposes. Moreover, the report also claims that while student usage is high, institutional adoption lags behind the rapid widespread use of AI. Only 73 percent of educators in the Philippines use generative AI for teaching, and an even lower 42 percent utilize it for their own writing. It is also stated that AI engagement is widely based on convenience rather than deeper and more rooted learning.
Read More