Dealing with Criticisms in Interdisciplinary Research
This paper highlights strategies for navigating interdisciplinary research challenges and turning criticisms into opportunities for growth.
Read More
This paper highlights strategies for navigating interdisciplinary research challenges and turning criticisms into opportunities for growth.
Read More
In the field of Scientometrics (or Science of Science), whether novel ideas experience more difficulties in dissemination and adoption is of particular interest. Evidence has been found that highly novel papers and grant proposals often suffer from stricter scrutiny and are more likely to be negatively evaluated.
Read More
How can doctoral students make theoretical and conceptual contributions to the literature of Information Science, which is especially competitive at the highest philosophical levels?
Read More
What Makes This Paper Great?, goes much deeper into the Information Science literature and lingers upon landmark papers.
Read More
Ideally, when work is evaluated by experts in the field, the process will filter out poor research, and identify and polish discoveries into real gems. However, a long-standing concern is reviewer bias, which broadly refers to evaluating scientific work not based solely on its quality.
Read More
Today, with misinformation and disinformation that may spread more quickly than facts on the internet, there is also fake and questionable research published in scholarly journals.
Read More
