Original

Dangling in the Sky: A Thought Experiment About Fear, Reality and Letting Go

Dangling in the Sky: A Thought Experiment About Fear, Reality and Letting Go

Sheng-Hsiang Lance Peng

We live in a time where information is everything but it’s also everything everywhere all at once. We get dizzy trying to figure out what’s real, what’s fake and what’s AI-generated nonsense. It’s a bit like digital acrophobia: a fear of being overwhelmed by the vastness of data, of letting go of our grip on what’s true.

Take for example, the overwhelming chaos of a news aggregator homepage, where headlines, pop-ups, live feeds, comment sections jostle for attention like a digital Times Square: an overload of stimuli that sends the cognitive equivalent of vertigo spiralling through the reader. Similarly, the sensation hits hard when going into a sea of academic citations, chasing a single elusive quote that’s been cited, re-cited and paraphrased into oblivion. Scrolling through thousands of references (only to discover the original wording buried in a 1970s conference proceeding scanned in lo-res PDF) is the scholarly equivalent of dangling from a cliff with a broken rope. These moments exemplify the disorienting heights and occasional absurdities of navigating knowledge in the digital age.

—Is This the Real Life? Is This Just Fantasy?—

Now imagine waking up and finding yourself dangling from a trapeze high above the clouds. No ground in sight, no harness, just your hands gripping a narrow bar while the wind whistles past your ears. Your heart’s racing, your palms are sweating. A part of your brain screams This has to be a dream! but the rest of you isn’t so sure. Everything feels too real: the weight of your body, the ache in your arms, the terrifying drop below. You consider letting go, thinking maybe that’ll jolt you awake. But… what if it doesn’t?

This is the scenario from a short clip by Zack D. Films and it made me think more than I expected. Not just because it’s a great hook for a psychological thriller but because it taps into something deep: fear, uncertainty and that odd line between what’s real and what’s not. Let’s pull that thread and see where it goes.

Is This the Real Life? Is This Just Fantasy?

First off there’s the obvious terror: acrophobia (the fear of heights), it’s primal. Evolution baked this into us long before we were building skyscrapers or watching YouTube shorts. Our ancestors knew falling=death so our brains learned to freak out at cliffs, tall trees or anything remotely high up.

But there’s another fear here that’s sneakier: agoraphobia. Most people think that’s just fear of open spaces but it’s more about the fear of being stuck somewhere you can’t escape. Imagine hanging midair, nothing around you, nowhere to run; it’s the ultimate trap. You’re not on a building you can climb down from or in a room you can exit. You’re floating in a weird, infinite sky, open, exposed and totally vulnerable.

Together, these fears mix into a psychological cocktail that hits hard: the terror of falling and the horror of being stuck.

Now let’s get weird, say you’re up there clutching that trapeze and you think: This is probably just a dream. I’ll just let go, fall and wake up in bed. But the problem is… it feels real. Really real. And you don’t want to test that theory by plummeting to your death.

This kind of brings to mind Descartes, the French philosopher who wondered How do I know I’m not dreaming right now? He basically said you can’t trust your senses because dreams can fool them. The only thing you can be sure of is that you’re thinking. (Hence his famous line: I think, therefore I am.)

Modern thinkers took that and ran with it. Some argue we could be living in a simulation, like in The Matrix and we’d never know. The trapeze scenario? Could be code; could be a glitch; could be your brain misfiring during REM sleep. You might be Neo or just a poor soul stuck in a really intense lucid dream.

The Existential Flip: Should I Let Go?

Here’s where the scenario gets philosophical: let’s say you’ve been hanging there a while. Your arms are getting tired. Panic turns into exhaustion. And an idea pops up: What if I just let go?

It’s a terrifying thought but also kind of freeing. This is where Albert Camus enters the picture, waving a cigarette and talking about absurdity. Camus believed life doesn’t come with a built-in meaning. The universe doesn’t care. It’s like being dropped in the middle of a Kafka novel: confusing, surreal, sometimes hilarious in a dark way.

He said the real philosophical question is whether life is worth living when it feels meaningless: do we keep hanging on or do we let go?

Of course Camus wasn’t telling people to jump. He said we should rebel by embracing life anyway, even when it makes no sense. So maybe up there on the trapeze, the act of choosing to hang on is its own kind of meaning?

That whole floating trapeze vibe to me is kind of how the internet feels these days: you’re suspended in a massive digital space, scrolling endlessly, surrounded by info but grounded by nothing.

Scenarios that provoke digital acrophobia, digital agoraphobia and related affective responses are user errors, interface quirks and also structurally embedded experiences. Ann Cvetkovich might read the affective weight of endlessly chasing citations or navigating overwhelming data platforms as part of an archive of feelings: where the emotional residue of scholarly labour is stored not just in texts but in the experience of searching itself. Sara Ahmed through her work on orientation and disorientation also offers a lens to understand how digital agoraphobia emerges in boundless, algorithmically generated spaces; here the user is lost and also disoriented, unable to anchor themselves in familiar narrative or spatial structures.

Virtual reality plays with this too. People feel vertigo in VR even when their feet are flat on the ground. Their brains get tricked. Just like in the trapeze clip, they respond with real fear to unreal danger.

The body says This is happening even when the mind isn’t so sure. It’s a glitch in the system, or maybe it is the system?

To me what makes Zack D. Films’ clip stick isn’t just the suspense or the cool visuals; it’s the way it captures a whole bunch of human experiences in one moment: fear, doubt, choice and the question of what’s real.

It’s a metaphor for every time we’ve felt suspended in life, stuck between action and paralysis, not knowing whether to hold on or let go; it’s about how we deal with uncertainty: whether in dreams, philosophy or a world where reality feels less solid by the day.

Final Thought: What Would You Do?

If you woke up on that trapeze what would you do? Would you scream? Pray? Try to climb up? Let go?

That question doesn’t have a right answer. But asking it (sitting with that terrifying, beautiful image) is what makes it powerful.

Sometimes hanging in the sky with no answers and no ground beneath you… that’s the most honest place to be.

Cite this article in APA as: Peng, S-H. L. (2025, July 2. Dangling in the sky: A thought experiment about fear, reality and letting go. Information Matters. https://informationmatters.org/2025/06/dangling-in-the-sky-a-thought-experiment-about-fear-reality-and-letting-go/

Author

  • Sheng-Hsiang Lance Peng

    Dr Peng is a Cornwall-based researcher (Falmouth/Exeter). His research explores a phantasmagoria of marginalised experiences through eerie and unsettling lenses including hauntology (Derrida), monster culture (Cohen) and mnemohistory (Assmann) to reflect on the cultural and social conditions shaping them.

    View all posts

Sheng-Hsiang Lance Peng

Dr Peng is a Cornwall-based researcher (Falmouth/Exeter). His research explores a phantasmagoria of marginalised experiences through eerie and unsettling lenses including hauntology (Derrida), monster culture (Cohen) and mnemohistory (Assmann) to reflect on the cultural and social conditions shaping them.