For instance, user information behavior research stands right on the intersection of information science, marketing science, and computer science (human-computer interaction, to be specific), with its research outputs possibly published in journals including JASIST, Infomation Technology and People, Computers in Human Behavior, Journal of Business Research and Human-Computer Interaction, which indicate distinct preferences for research methods, frameworks and contributions. The diverse publication channels provide opportunities but also challenges to the researchers, especially those newcomers. Although information system user behavior is included in the aims and scopes of all these journals, attention is paid to different aspects of research (for example, system design, user purchase intention, information and communication technology application) and the different reviewer pools of journals lead to varying tastes for the so-called good and publishable research. So, what can a researcher do in such a complex and challenging setting?

One of the first steps in dealing with criticisms in an interdisciplinary research setting is to understand the source of the criticism. Is it based on a lack of understanding of the research context or methods? Or is it a valid critique that points to potential weaknesses or gaps in the research? Once the source of the criticism is identified, the next step is to address it in a constructive manner.

When faced with criticisms that stem from a need for more understanding of the interdisciplinary nature of the research, it is challenging but vital to “educate” the reviewers. This can be done by providing additional background information, clarifying the theoretical framework and methodology, or highlighting the research’s relevance to multiple disciplines. It is the author’s duty to bridge the knowledge gap for the reviewers and future readers, and such bridging can increase one’s chances of receiving a more favorable and informed review.

Besides, it is crucial to approach it with an open mind if the criticism is valid and points to areas that need improvement. No research can be perfect, so it is with the knowledge of its conductors. Interdisciplinary research often involves exploring new and untested ideas, and creative (and sometimes “weird” at first sight) criticisms can serve as valuable feedback for refining and strengthening the research. Instead of viewing criticisms as obstacles, the researchers should be more open-minded and see them as opportunities for growth and development.

Another challenge in interdisciplinary research is dealing with the potential for conflicting reviews. Given the diverse backgrounds of reviewers, it is possible to receive contradictory feedback from different academic standpoints. In such cases, it is essential to carefully analyze each review, looking for common themes or areas of agreement. This can help identify the core issues that need to be addressed in the research. It is always a wise choice to respect each comment and try to cater to the reviewers’ criticisms equally.

Effective communication with reviewers is also vital in navigating the peer review process in interdisciplinary research. If a review contains unclear or misplaced criticisms or suggestions, the researchers should be open and brave and engage in a respectful and constructive dialogue with the reviewer. This can help clarify misunderstandings and ensure that the research is evaluated fairly and accurately.

Furthermore, building a network of colleagues and mentors from different disciplines can provide invaluable support in dealing with varying criticisms. These individuals, although they are aware of parts of your research, can offer insights into the review process, provide guidance on how to address specific criticisms with their experience, and offer encouragement during challenging times.

Last but not least, it is always the researchers who should be responsible for tailoring their manuscripts for the desired publication venues. The authors should thoroughly understand the journal’s subject, main readership, potential reviewers’ (at least the editorial board members’) educational backgrounds, and styles of writing and presentation before polishing their manuscripts and submitting them for peer review and potential publication.

In summary, dealing with criticisms in interdisciplinary research settings requires a nuanced approach. It involves understanding the source of the criticism, addressing it in a constructive manner, and viewing it as an opportunity for growth and refinement. By navigating the peer review process effectively, interdisciplinary researchers can overcome the challenges they face and contribute to the advancement of knowledge and understanding across multiple disciplines.